|
PROGRAM
Teaching With [a] Difference
Friday, July
28, 2000
Welcome
Laurie Richlin
President & Conference Director,
International Alliance of Teacher Scholars
Milton D. Cox
University Director for Teaching Effectiveness Programs &
Founder & Director, Original Lilly Conference,
Miami University
Keynote:Three Pedagogical Changes That Make a
Difference in ANY Classroom
Craig Nelson, Biology
and Public & Environmental Affairs,
Indiana University
When diversity issues are cast in content-centered ways, many faculty
members view them as irrelevant to their own teaching. Examination of
pedagogical practices reveals a need for major changes in all courses.
Hence, this session will make your day! If your teaching is free of
discrimination: deep affirmation. If not, you will understand
unintentional bias and will have strategies to make your classroom fairer.
Turning a Faculty Development Center Into an Active Learning
Center
James M. Salvador & Holly Denney, Center for Effective
Teaching & Learning
University of Texas at El Paso
Participants will discuss and actively engage in the strategy of
getting faculty to demonstrate what they do through leading faculty
development workshops. It’s been our observation that presenters often
benefit the most, a concept not unlike the active learning techniques used
in classrooms. We took that observation to the next logical level and
organized an Active Learning Conference for our faculty, an activity so
successful it will now be repeated twice a year.
Design Factors of Web-Based Information Skills for Freshman
Seminar
Linda B. Alexander & Robert Smith, School of Integrative
Studies in Teacher Education,
Western Kentucky University
This presentation is based on a study comparing the performance and
preferences of students enrolled in a Web-based and a traditional library
skills component of a freshman seminar program. Descriptive and
inferential statistics were performed on data collected. Research findings
revealed significant differences between groups on
satisfaction/demographic variables. Web courses draw from non-traditional
student populations, who are more satisfied with the format, than
traditional students who prefer the conventional classroom setting.
Build It, And They Will Come: What Does It Take To Build
Great Student Learning Communities?
Gwyn Boyter, Rick Kreminski,
Texas A & M University – Commerce
Presenters will briefly share significant aspects of building an
innovative learning community concept for entering freshman, which will be
inaugurated in fall 2000. Participants will then be involved in structured
activities to identify and discuss components of an effective student
learning community.
Growing a Teaching-Learning Center
Max Elden, School of Business and Public Administration, Margaret
Snooks, Fitness & Human Performance,
Wendy McKean, Human Resource Management
Judy Bergman, Mathematics,
Mike McMullen, Sociology
& Lillian McEnery, Education,
University of Houston - Clear Lake
This session will recount the activities that, in retrospect, are
contributing to the deliberate evolution of a highly participatory
teaching-learning center in which faculty and students help faculty master
more powerful ways of enhancing student learning. The activities include a
teaching improvement self-help group of faculty who have been meeting
informally for lunch on a monthly basis for more than three years, an ad
hoc committee of senior faculty who raised the issue on a university-wide
basis and surveyed faculty attitudes toward teaching and its improvement,
and a self-selected group of faculty who are exploring how a
teaching-learning center could best be created to meet the needs revealed
by the survey. Representatives from each of these activities will present
their experiences and plans for further development as a basis for
feedback on the approach.
Communication in Instruction: Teaching and Learning as a
Relational Activity
Timothy P. Mottet & Steven A. Beebe, Speech Communication,
Southwest Texas State University
Effective teachers are effective communicators - they understand the
relational aspects of teaching and learning. How does "what you
say" and "how you say it" influence student learning? How
does student communication influence you and your teaching? How are
emotions in the classroom communicated and "caught"? How can
focusing on students enhance your classroom communication? These are just
some of the questions this session will explore based upon over two
decades of research in instructional communication.
Vive la Louisiane: Un Etat Pas Comme Tous les Autres
Susan F. Spillman, Languages,
Xavier University of Louisiana
This session demonstrates a CD-Rom for teaching languages and culture
that features Francophone Louisiana residents speaking in French about
work responsibilities, family background, and other cultural tasks. All
the language task activities and structures featured will be presented in
video interviews with native speakers of French from southern Louisiana.
The videos depict the multiethnic, multicultural presence of French in
Louisiana and feature Creole, Cajun, Vietnamese, and Caribbean speakers of
French.
Student Learning Portfolios/Faculty Teaching Portfolios: A
Look at Each From Both Sides, Now
Milton D. Cox, Teaching Effectiveness Programs,
Miami University
This session will explore the purposes, benefits, and
challenges of student learning portfolios and faculty teaching portfolios.
Both can play important roles as developmental and assessment processes
for students and faculty. I will bring several student portfolios for
"hands on" examination, providing an opportunity to see their
effectiveness as reflective documents which increase students' awareness
of their learning and inform and guide the instructor's teaching. I will
also display some faculty teaching portfolios which illustrate potential
for demonstrating the effectiveness of teaching and learning, including
the complexities of one's philosophy, style, students, and discipline. We
will note the results of Miami's departmental teaching portfolio project
and how portfolios are used to select award-winning teachers. In
conclusion, we will look at student and faculty portfolios from "both
sides."
Planning for Instruction
Henryk Marcinkiewicz, Center for Teaching, Learning, &
Faculty Development,
Ferris State University
Instruction does not just happen; there is rhyme and reason to it.
Should it be planned? If so, what should be considered? How are these
areas integrated? How can a professor possibly account for all that might
happen during instruction? This session will serve as an introduction with
substance for the novice, or as a meaningful refresher to the experienced
teacher.
Encouraging and Rewarding Scholarly Teaching and the
Scholarship of Teaching
Laurie Richlin, President,
International Alliance of Teacher Scholars
What is the definition of teaching excellence? of scholarly teaching?
of the scholarship of teaching? How are they the same or different from
each other? Who should be expected to participate in scholarly teaching or
the scholarship of teaching? What are the outcomes of scholarly teaching?
of the scholarship of teaching? How should they be evaluated? How should
they be rewarded? The presenter will bring participants up-to-date on
current thinking about these issues, and lead small group discussions to
help clarify these ideas.
Teaching Excellence: What’s Important and What’s Not!
Loyd S. Wright, Paul C. Raffeld, Theron Stimmel, & R. Wade Wheeler,
Psychology, Southwest Texas State University
Experts agree that effective college teaching is multidimensional. The
question is, "Does the importance of these dimensions vary from one
type of class to another?" After assigning participants to small
groups based on the type of classes they typically teach, groups will be
asked to rank the importance of nine dimensions of effective teaching. We
will compare the rankings among groups and present the results of a study
that was conducted to answer this question.
Videoconferencing: Making One Class Using Several Sites
Richard Tuerk, Literature & Languages,
Texas A & M University – Commerce
The presentation will explore ways of overcoming problems of alienation
involving students at different sites in classes taught using interactive
television. It will demonstrate that such problems exist and explore the
theoretical and real consequences. It will investigate ways to overcome
the problems while retaining quality and producing a better learning
experience for both students and instructors.
Technology and Instructional Design Make a Difference
Nancy Hadley, Education,
Angelo State University
Procrastination and passivity plague university classrooms in all
disciplines. A strategy will be presented for structuring classroom
interactions to maximize student engagement and shift more responsibility
for learning to the student. This strategy combines Gagne’s
instructional design principles with effective uses of technology to offer
heuristics for applying technology based on the domain of the objective
sought. Example course structure will be given and results of student
surveys shared.
Teaching/Learning With a Different Approach
Maggy Smith, Office of the Provost
& Dorothy Ward, Entering Student Program, University of Texas – El Paso
The University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP) is a majority-minority (66%
Hispanic), largely commuter institution, where most students are the first
in their families to attend college. To address the particular needs of
its first-year students, UTEP has initiated the Seminar in Critical
Inquiry. This presentation briefly overviews the development of the
Entering Student Program, including the institutional challenges involved
with bridging Student Affairs and Academic Affairs, and uniting
college-initiated programs with university-initiated programs. It will
provide an overview of the major program and will address in detail the
seminar and its acceptance as a core curriculum course.
Motivation: How to Plan for It in Your Instruction
Henryk Marcinkiewicz, Center for Teaching, Learning, &
Faculty Development,
Ferris State University
Lack of motivation among students is a little like the weather: you can
talk about it but you don’t quite know what to do about it. Also, there
is a mass of theories of motivation. What can you do to motivate your
students? This presentation will present a model which summarizes most
major theories, including Keller’s ARCS model, and will draw suggestions
from the participants about how to apply the model in planning for
instruction.
Walking in Another’s Shoes: Utilizing Oral Readings for
Out-of-Consciousness Experiences
Jeffrey DeLotto, Languages & Literature,
Texas Wesleyan University
Through a brief presentation, I will ground the practice of an oral
reading of literature in composition theory, postmodernism, and
multiculturalism. Working toward reason and encouragement for the practice
I will suggest its facility in getting students beyond themselves and into
the consciousnesses of others. We then break up into groups with sample
texts/readings for participants’ (and you will all be
participants) practice and encouragement. The session will conclude with a
review of suggested practices and guided practice from selected texts.
8:30pm & Resource Fair
Join your colleagues for libation and snacks while you visit with
poster session presenters. There will be refreshments and an open beverage
station (sodas, wine, and beer) at this after-dinner Reception/Poster
Session/Resource Fair. If you have materials about your work, program,
or project, let me know and we will have a table ready for you for
display at the Resource Fair. This is lots of fun and gives participants
an opportunity to talk with others in a relaxed atmosphere about the
exciting work your colleagues and you are doing (or thinking about doing).
Formal Appointments and Reported Responsibilities for
University Faculty
Laurie M. Apple, Family & Consumer Sciences,
Southwest Texas State University
This poster presents a study that compared the responsibilities and
selected outcome measures of Texas comprehensive university faculty. This
is part of a larger study where faculty reported spending considerable
time on teaching, advising undergraduate and graduate students, conducting
research, providing service and some administrative duties, regardless of
assigned percentage to responsibility. As expected, findings indicated
teaching loads and emphasis on types of scholarly output differed between
disciplines. However, do responsibilities of a faculty member affect
teaching effectiveness?
Teaching Disability Philosophy and Concepts Through Team
Building
Daniel Cook, Rehabilitation Education & Research,
University of Arkansas
This poster will describe a unique graduate course on independent
living (IL). The course provides an opportunity for students to study
problems and practices involved in developing and maintaining IL programs
for people with severe disabilities. The course merges lectures and media
presentations with a hands-on approach where student teams are organized
to write a federal grant to establish a local IL center. Members from each
team are required to lead a seminar on an IL grant-related topic. The
instructor serves as a consultant to the teams. Team members are
encouraged to contact community leaders in developing seminars and as
grant writing resources.
Publishing the Scholarship of Teaching
Milton D. Cox, Teaching Effectiveness Programs,
Editor-in-Chief, Journal on Excellence in College Teaching,
Miami University
Find out how-to’s of publishing your teaching scholarship. Discuss
your ideas for articles and books and get feedback on your plans.
Promoting a Campus Dialogue on the Scholarship of Teaching
Theron Stimmel, Psychology, Nancy Chavkin, Social Work,
C. Sue McCullough, Educational Administration &
Psychological Services
& Ronald Brown, University College,
Southwest Texas State University
In fall, 1999, with a small grant from the Kellogg Foundation, our
campus began a dialogue on the scholarship of teaching. Results from a
faculty survey indicated areas of concern and generated interest in
proceeding with an examination of teaching and its reward structure. Four
faculty committees explored different aspects of the scholarship of
teaching. This poster will describe the process, share the survey, and
provide dialogue outcomes to date.
The Third Time is the Charm: The Evolving Nature of Web
Martha Meacham, Instructional Technology,
St. Edward’s University
The process of creating instructional Web pages is an iterative
process. Not only should revisions be made using formative feedback from
the primary audience members, but designers should constantly be aware of
ways to provide real-world experiences for students. Faculty who may feel
unsuccessful in their endeavor to add value by adding technology to their
course should be encouraged to "try again." To be successful,
the process is one of continuous change and improvement.
Teaching in Kazakhstan
Laurie Richlin, President,
International Alliance of Teacher Scholars
The PowerPoint™ presentation will show the students, professors,
institutions, and settings of a weeklong experience in the summer of 1999.
The presenter taught Sociology graduate students from many of the former
Eastern republics of the USSR who were developing their doctoral
proposals.
Saturday,
July 29, 2000
Fostering Critical Thinking and Mature Valuing Across the
Curriculum
Craig Nelson, Biology and Public & Environmental Affairs,
Indiana University
Sophistication in thinking is prerequisite to many of the goals of
liberal and professional education. This major workshop will explore the
implications of classroom practices of each of three important frameworks
for fostering critical thinking: cognitive science, intellectual and
ethical development, and thinking-as-conversation. An underlying theme
will be that critical thinking often can be fostered best by increasing
the ratio of support offered for a given level of challenge.
Student Learning Communities and Faculty Learning
Communities:
Change the Teaching and Learning Culture on Your Campus
Milton D. Cox, University Director for Teaching Effectiveness
Programs,
Founder & Director, Original Lilly Conference, Miami University
Faculty learning communities offer many of the same learning outcomes
as student learning communities. When compared to "regular
courses," both students and faculty in learning communities evidence
greater satisfaction with college life, improved communication across
disciplines and with each other, a better understanding of self and
others, a faster rate of intellectual development, better retention rates,
and a stronger commitment to civic responsibility. In this session we will
investigate ways of building faculty learning communities on your campus.
We will also examine the above outcomes as well as some of the obstacles
challenging the implementation and continuation of learning communities.
The Teaching Portfolio: Putting It All Together
Evelyn J. Posey, Academic Affairs
& Darla Smith, School of Allied Health/Kinesiology,
University of Texas at El Paso
At universities nationwide, teaching portfolios are increasingly used
to demonstrate effective teaching in an organized and convincing way. So
what is all of this talk about teaching portfolios? Who should create one?
What should it include? Where do you begin? This workshop provides an
overview of the teaching portfolio movement, including a discussion of the
pros and cons of creating teaching portfolios, what a portfolio should
include, and how it can be used for both formative and summative
evaluation.
Drawing Connections: A Logical Case for Visual
Representation of Arguments
M. Francine Danis, English/Drama/Communication Arts,
Our Lady of the Lake University
Far from being childish and indulgent forms of expression, the use of
drawing, webbing, concept mapping, and related strategies helps us do the
critical thinking necessary to argue with conviction and compassion. This
session will provide opportunities for visual representation aids us in
discovering our claims and considering our audiences.
True Colors: A Method for Considering and Capitalizing on
Differences
Janet Bezner & Brenda Boucher, Physical Therapy,
Southwest Texas State University
The management of human relationships and the appreciation of
differences are crucial to success in education and other businesses. Our
True Color course provides a model for relationships that can be applied
to any setting. Participants will identify their color/style and explore
the way in which their color spectrum influences communications and
behaviors. Participants will learn to view differences as strengths to
enhance communication, cooperation, and group effectiveness.
Using the Bafa Bafa Simulations to Increase
Cross-Cultural Awareness
Joan Rivera & Sharynn Tomlin, Business Administration,
Angelo State University
Bafa Bafa is a powerful, innovative simulation designed to increase
cross-cultural awareness and appreciation. It provides participants with a
first-hand experience interfacing with a dissimilar culture. With the
fast-growing global economy, students around the world benefit from the
cross-cultural exposure this simulation offers. The workshop is suitable
for professors who wish to sensitize students to change, whether it be
within a organization, or across national boundaries.
Rules & Roles: Meetings That Work
Henryk Marcinkiewicz, Center for Teaching, Learning, &
Faculty Development,
Ferris State University
Faculty and administrators in higher education are expected to
participate in meetings. Unfortunately, it is often assumed that meetings
will be effective "by themselves" or without a deliberate plan.
The truth is that with a realization that there are simple rules to
establish and follow as well as roles to assume, meetings can be very
effective…even enjoyable. After all, participating in meetings is part
of our work; we should plan to do it well.
Nontraditional-Aged Students and New Technology: Fear and
Loathing in Cyberspace
Libby Allison, English,
Southwest Texas State University
As more older students enter higher education, professors are faced
with how to teach technology to students who are often frustrated with and
fearful of it. This session will provide new approaches to helping
students more easily accept and learn from technology. Through small group
interaction, we will examine our own experiences learning to use computers
and will use these experiences to learn to teach others. In addition, I
will share my approaches to teaching technology to older students.
Teaching Effectiveness Dimensions and Evaluation
C. Sue McCullough & Marianne Reese, Educational
Administration & Psychological Services
& Tim Mottet, Speech Communication,
Southwest Texas State University
Southwest Texas State University began a faculty dialogue on the
scholarship of teaching in fall, 1999. This presentation will reflect the
process that resulted in identifying dimensions of teaching effectiveness,
multiple evaluation sources, and key issues in rewarding effective
teaching. Participants will reflect on how effective teaching is
identified, evaluated, and rewarded at their own institutions and generate
an action plan for themselves or their institutions to generate dialogue
on the scholarship of teaching.
Presentation Style: A Comparison of Socratic and Feminist
Approaches
Elaine Fredericksen & Tony Stafford, English,
The University of Texas
at El Paso
The traditional college/university presentation style involves lectures
followed by teacher-led discussions. Using the Socratic method, professors
elicit from students answers to pre-determined questions for which
professors have preferred answers. Through exploratory discussion,
students come to articulate these "correct" answers. Feminist
presentation style presumes that students have read the material, and
often there is no lecture. Rather, professors serve as discussion
facilitators, beginning with a leading question and allowing conversation
to take its own path, intervening only to clarify or to refocus when
discussion lags. The feminist professor has no predetermined answers.
|